I Don’t Get It, So You Must Be Wrong
* From “The A**HOLE’S Guide To Arguing (Or, How To Succeed In Politics)”
“Evolution? Maybe your ancestors were amoebas, but mine certainly weren’t. Maybe that’s why you’re so dumb. You came from frickin’ amoebas. My ancestors were humans.”
“The Bible says that God is good. I don’t see how a good God could allow all this suffering. So either God is not good, or there is no God.”
“The Bible also tells us that the Lord works in mysterious ways. And how could you look at this world, at all the wonders He has created and still think that there is no God, or that He is not good?”
Here, both argue that the other is wrong from the same fallacy. Neither are able to see the other persons point of view or understand their argument.
One is incapable of or unwilling to see that God exists, or that he is good. The other is equally incapable of seeing that he might not exist, or that he might not be good. These two will never agree.
To reach an agreement or win someone over, the other must be willing to entertain the thought that they might be wrong. Or at the very least be open to new ideas and evidence. Share on XOne response to personal incredulity would be to point out that many things that we now take for granted were before thought impossible.
Mobiles, computers, television, aircraft, submarines and space travel were just science fiction. Weird ideas inhabiting the daydreams of people with too much time on their hands and no common sense.
Even the best of us can make errors here.
History is full of instances where experts have been unable to see the usefulness of inventions, and dismissed ideas as being too far fetched and unbelievable, only to be proven wrong. Share on XUnbelievable does not mean impossible.
Remember that.
© Merlyn Gabriel Miller